PEMERIKSAAN MATA MENGGUNAKAN TENTATIF REFRAKSI  DI PONDOK PESANTREN SIRAAJUL UMMAH

Anggit Nugroho; Motris Pamungkas; Arief Witjaksono; Nurwidianto Nurwidianto; M. Fariz Nur; Nopia Siti Nurazizah

Anggit Nugroho Cicendo National Eye Hospital
Motris Pamungkas Dharma Husada College of Health Sciences
Arief Witjaksono Dharma Husada College of Health Sciences
Nurwidianto Nurwidianto Dharma Husada College of Health Sciences
M. Fariz Nur Dharma Husada College of Health Sciences
Nopia Siti Nurazizah Dharma Husada College of Health Sciences

Keywords: Eye Examination, Tentative Refraction, Refractive Disorders

Abstract

Refractive disorders are one of the main causes of vision problems that can reduce an individual's quality of life, especially if they are not detected and addressed early. The community living in pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) often does not have adequate access to eye examination services, even though their learning and worship activities heavily rely on optimal vision function. This community service activity aims to conduct early detection of refractive disorders and vision problems through tentative refractive examinations at Pondok Pesantren Siraajul Ummah, Karangrahayu, Karangbahagia District, Bekasi Regency. The activity was conducted on February 20, 2022, targeting 100 people consisting of students and teachers. The examination included visual acuity screening and subjective refraction using a trial lens set and trial frame. The results showed that 30.5% of participants experienced myopia, 25.0% experienced astigmatism, 10.5% experienced hyperopia, and 42.0% experienced presbyopia. About 4.0% of participants were found to have organic eye disorders such as cataracts and pterygium, which were subsequently referred for further examination. These findings emphasize the importance of regular eye examinations in educational communities based in pesantren. Through this activity, participants not only received examination services but also education regarding the importance of maintaining eye health and the proper use of optical correction. This activity is expected to serve as a community-based promotive-preventive model for eye health in improving the vision health status of the pesantren community.

References

WHO. (2021). World report on vision. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2018). Riskesdas 2018. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan.
Resnikoff, S. et al. (2008). Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(1), pp.63–70.
Iskandar, A. & Rahmah, N. (2020). Akses Layanan Kesehatan di Pesantren. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat, 12(2), pp.133–140.
Sihite, J. et al. (2019). Kesehatan Mata dan Produktivitas Santri. Jurnal Kesehatan Mata Indonesia, 6(1), pp.10–18.
American Optometric Association. (2021). Optometric Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Murthy, G. et al. (2012). Refractive Error in Children in Urban India. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(4), pp.125–132.
Naidoo, K. et al. (2014). Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(8), pp. 557–562.
Grosvenor, T. (2007). Primary Care Optometry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Reddy, P. A. et al. (2020). Community-based refractive error screening using trial lenses. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(5), pp.812–818.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2022). Buku Saku Edukasi Kesehatan Mata. Jakarta.
Afrianty, D. & Muslim, A. (2021). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap gangguan penglihatan dan penggunaan kacamata. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 13(2), pp.145–152.
Setiawan, R. et al. (2023). Pemberdayaan pesantren dalam promosi kesehatan. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), pp.40–48.
UNDIP. (2023). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. New York: United Nations. Hennemann S, Böhme K, Baumeister H, et al 2018, ‘Efficacy of a guided internet-based intervention (iSOMA) for somatic symptoms and related distress in university students: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial’, BMJ Open, vol. 8, no. 13. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024929
Dandona, R., & Dandona, L. (2006). Refractive error blindness. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(3), 237-243.
Holden, B.A., et al. (2016). Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology, 123(5), 1036–1042.
Wu, P.C., et al. (2013). Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset and progression in school children. Ophthalmology, 120(5), 1080-1085
Hashemi, H., et al. (2017). Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 30(1), 3–22.
Pi, L.H., et al. (2015). Refractive status and prevalence of refractive errors in suburban school-age children in China. Clinical & Experimental Optometry, 95(3), 297–302
Duane, A. (1912). Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. Journal of the American Medical Association, 59(12), 1010-1013.
Patel, I., et al. (2006). Presbyopia: Prevalence, impact, and interventions. Community Eye Health Journal, 19(58), 20–21.
Marmamula, S., et al. (2013). Prevalence and risk factors for pterygium in the South Indian adult population: The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97(6), 785–788.
WHO. (2019). World report on vision. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267.
Naidoo, K.S., et al. (2014). Scaling up access to eye care: The global challenge of refractive error. Community Eye Health Journal, 27(87), 17–19.